Environment and Resource Management

Measuring ecological equivalence

Under the Policy for Vegetation Management (PDF, 303K)* Offsets and Biodiversity Offsets Policy (PDF, 515K)* the land-based offsets must achieve or exceed ecological equivalence with the respective clearing/impact area. Information must be provided to demonstrate this.

How is ecological equivalence measured?

Demonstrating ecological equivalence on the proposed clearing/impact area and offset area requires an ecological equivalence assessment of both areas. Ecological equivalence comprises of two components:

The ecological condition and special features’ criteria are made up of 28 ecological indicators, listed in Table 1 below.

 The indicators have been drawn from the department’s BioCondition Methodology (PDF, 4.1M)*, and the Biodiversity Assessment and Mapping Methodology/Biodiversity Planning Assessments.

Ecological equivalence criterion and indicators

Criteria 1 – Ecological condition indicators              

  1. Recruitment of woody perennial species
  2. Native plant species richness   
  3. Tree canopy height 
  4. Tree canopy cover
  5.  Shrub canopy cover
  6.  Native perennial grass cover
  7.  Organic litter 
  8. Large trees 
  9. Coarse woody debris 
  10. Weed cover 
  11. Size of patch  (fragmented landscapes) 
  12. Connectivity  (fragmented landscapes)
  13. Context (fragmented landscapes)
  14. Distance from water  (Intact landscapes)

Criteria 2 – Special features indicators

  1. Centres of endemism
  2. Wildlife refugia 
  3. Disjunct populations 
  4. Taxa at limits of geographic range
  5. High species richness 
  6. Relictual populations 
  7. Regional ecosystems with distinct variation in species associated with geomorphologic and other environmental variables
  8. Artificial water body of ecological significance 
  9. High density hollow bearing trees
  10. Breeding or roosting areas used by significant number of individuals  
  11. Priority species within the bioregion
  12. Strategic ecological corridor
  13. Significance of patch within a one kilometre buffer
  14. Protected area estate buffer

Ecological equivalence between the proposed clearing/impact area and offset area is demonstrated when the following occur:

How is ecological equivalence assessed?

Ecological equivalence can be assessed either using the department’s Ecological Equivalence Methodology (EEM) (PDF, 1.7M)*, or using the ecological equivalence criteria and indicators.

The EEM has been developed as a tool to support the measurement of ecological equivalence under the Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets and the Biodiversity Offsets Policy.

The EEM uses both on-ground and spatial analysis in a way which provides a consistent framework for assessing ecological equivalence that can be practically applied by applicants, consultants, offset brokers and DERM assessment staff. 

What are the benefits of using the Ecological Equivalence Methodology?

The benefits of using the EEM include:

If the offset area achieves ecological equivalence, will it be automatically approved?

No, an offset will not be automatically approved. Ecological equivalence is only one element within either the Policy for Vegetation Management Offsets or Biodiversity Offsets Policy.

All of the relevant criteria in the associated offset policy must be met before an offset is approved. 

Further Information

For further information please refer to the following offset web pages:

If you have any questions about offsets and the EEM, please contact your nearest departmental business centre or email the offsets team offsets@derm.qld.gov.au.

* Requires Adobe Reader

Last updated 3 October 2011

Environmental offsets

Topics in this site